(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2019)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2018)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2017)
(2016)
(2016)
Special Issue - (2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2016)
(2015)
(2015)
Special Issue - (2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2015)
(2012)
(2012)
(2012)
Special Issue - (2012)
1 |
Evaluating Relationship between Mixed-land Use and Land-use Compatibility in Algiers BayKarim Cheniki, Amel Baziz, Bouzid Boudiaf
pp. 389-404 | Article Number: ijese.2019.032
Abstract MLU is considered as one of the main component leading to a successful urban planning and urban regeneration operations. This policy was advocated as principal characteristics of contemporary urban trends. Most of the literature focalized on the relationship between MLU and other factors such as transport, health and other social aspects. However, the study of relationship between MLU and LUC seems to be completely ignored even such studies are scarce when talking about Algerian cities. Hence, this paper is a part of a study where one of the main objectives is to explain the relationship between MLU and LUC and by using Algiers’ bay as a case study. This paper is structured in three sections. The first section deals with the review of the development of mixture through the available literature. The second section is related to the assessment of the MLU and its compatibility, this assessment is done by using Algiers Bay as a case study. The last section consists of evaluating the relationship between those two factors by using Spearman’s Rho correlation coefficient. This study leads us to confirm that there is a direct relationship between MLU and LUC. However, it is important to mention that MLU may have a negative impact on land use compatibility, so, the challenge for the planners is to find the balance between MLU and LUC. Moreover, it is imperative to integrate LUC as a variable in measuring MLU. Keywords: mixed land-use, land-use compatibility, Algiers, MAVT References Abedini, A., Lotfian, M., & Moradi, M. (2015). Land Use Compatibility Assessment Using a Modified Topsis Model: a Case Study of Elementary Schools in Tehran. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W5-5-2015 Bahadure, S., & Kotharkar, R. (2015). Assessing Sustainability of Mixed Use Neighbourhoods through Residents’ Travel Behaviour and Perception: The Case of Nagpur, India. Sustainability, 7(9), 12164-12189. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70912164 Bakhtiarifar, M., Mesgari, M., Karimi, M., & Chehreghani, A. (2011). Land use change modeling using multi-criteria decision analysis and GIS. Journal of Environmental Studies, 37(58), 43-52. Bordoloi, R., Mote, A., Sarkar, P. P., & Mallikarjuna, C. (2013). Quantification of land use diversity in the context of mixed land use. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 104, 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.150 Coupland, A. (1997). Reclaiming the city: Mixed use development: Taylor & Francis. da Cruz, N. F., & Marques, R. C. (2017). Structuring composite local governance indicators. Policy Studies, 38(2), 109-129. Duncan, M. J., Winkler, E., Sugiyama, T., Cerin, E., Leslie, E., & Owen, N. (2010). Relationships of land use mix with walking for transport: do land uses and geographical scale matter? Journal of urban health, 87(5), 782-795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11524-010-9488-7 Ferretti, V., Bottero, M., & Mondini, G. (2014). Decision making and cultural heritage: An application of the Multi-Attribute Value Theory for the reuse of historical buildings. Journal of cultural heritage, 15(6), 644-655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.culher.2013.12.007 Forman, E., & Peniwati, K. (1998). Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the analytic hierarchy process. European journal of operational research, 108(1), 165-169. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(97)00244-0 Frank, L. D., & Pivo, G. (1994). Impacts of mixed use and density on utilization of three modes of travel: single-occupant vehicle, transit, and walking. Transportation research record, 1466, 44-52. Gehrke, S. R., & Clifton, K. J. (2016). Toward a spatial-temporal measure of land-use mix. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2015.725 Grant, J. (2002). Mixed use in theory and practice: Canadian experience with implementing a planning principle. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(1), 71-84. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208977192 Haining, R. (1991). Bivariate correlation with spatial data. Geographical Analysis, 23(3), 210-227. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1991.tb00235.x Hajna, S., Dasgupta, K., Joseph, L., & Ross, N. A. (2014). A call for caution and transparency in the calculation of land use mix: measurement bias in the estimation of associations between land use mix and physical activity. Health & place, 29, 79-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.06.002 Huang, S.-W., & Hsieh, H.-I. (2014). The Study of the Relationship between Accessibility and Mixed Land Use in Tainan, Taiwan. International Journal of Environmental Science and Development, 5(4), 352. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJESD.2014.V5.508 Javadi, G., Taleai, M., & Karimi, M. (2013). Evaluating various criteria for determining diversity of urban Mixed Land Use via GIS (Case Study: neighborhoods and districts of Tehran Municipality No. 7). Lagendijk, A. (2001). Regional learning between variation and convergence: the concept of ‘mixed land-use’in regional spatial planning in the Netherlands. Canadian Journal of Regional Science, 24(1), 135-154. Masoomi, Z. (2014). Modeling physical impacts ofurban land-use change using optimization algorithms and spatial analyses, PhD Thesis in Geographic Information Systems: Khaje Nasir Toosi University of Technology. McNeill, D. (2011). Fine grain, global city: Jan Gehl, public space and commercial culture in central Sydney. Journal of urban design, 16(2), 161-178. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2011.548977 Nabil, N. A., & Eldayem, G. E. A. (2015). Influence of mixed land-use on realizing the social capital. HBRC Journal, 11(2), 285-298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hbrcj.2014.03.009 Ozbil, A., Peponis, J., & Stone, B. (2011). Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows. Urban Design International, 16(2), 125-141. https://doi.org/10.1057/udi.2011.2 Rupjyoti, B., Amit, M., Partha, S. P., & Mallikarjuna, C. (2013). Quantification of Land Use diversity in the context of mixed land use. Procedia-Socail and Behavioral Sciences 104, 563-572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.11.150 Saaty, T. L. (1990). How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 9-26. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I Saaty, T. L. (2002). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. Scientia Iranica, 9(3), 215-229. Saaty, T. L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International journal of services sciences, 1(1), 83-98. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590 Shi, B., & Yang, J. (2015). Scale, distribution, and pattern of mixed land use in central districts: A case study of Nanjing, China. Habitat International, 46, 166-177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2014.11.008 Sohn, D.-W. (2016). Do all commercial land uses deteriorate neighborhood safety?: Examining the relationship between commercial land-use mix and residential burglary. Habitat International, 55, 148-158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2016.03.007 Song, Y., & Rodríguez, D. A. (2005). The measurement of the level of mixed land uses: A synthetic approach. Carolina Transportation Program White Paper Series, Chapel Hill, NC. Song, Y., Merlin, L., & Rodriguez, D. (2013). Comparing measures of urban land use mix. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 42, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2013.08.001 Taleai, M., Sharifi, A., Sliuzas, R., & Mesgari, M. (2007). Evaluating the compatibility of multi-functional and intensive urban land uses. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 9(4), 375-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2006.12.002 Taleshi, M., & Ghobadi, A. (2012). Urban Land Use Sustainability Assessment through Evaluation of Compatibility Matrix Case Study: Karaj City. OIDA International Journal of Sustainable Development, 3(1), 57-64. Teller, J., & Becue, V. (2005). Comment concevoir un quartier «multifonction» pour promouvoir un développement urbain durable? Paper presented at the Proc. du colloque Développement urbain durable, gestion des ressources et gouvernance. Vaezi, S., Mesgari, M., & Kaviary, F. (2015). Evaluation of Effecting Parameters on Optimum Arrangement of Urban Land Uses and Assessment of Their Compatibility Using Adjacency Matrix. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, 40(1), 725. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XL-1-W5-725-2015 Vargas, L. G. (1990). An overview of the analytic hierarchy process and its applications. European Journal of Operational Research, 48(1), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(90)90056-H Verhagen, A. P., Ostelo, R. W., & Rademaker, A. (2004). Is the p value really so significant? Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 50(4), 261-262. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0004-9514(14)60122-7 Vreeker, R. (2004). Urban multifunctional land use and externalities. Zahedi, F. (1986). The Analytic Hierarchy Process—A Survey of the Method and its Applications. Interfaces, 16(4), 96-108. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.16.4.96 |
View Abstract References Full text PDF |
2 |
Distribution of Endemic Birds in Protected Forests in IndonesiaFransina Sarah Latumahina, & Gun Mardiatmoko
pp. 405-416 | Article Number: ijese.2019.033
Abstract The spread and diversity of bird species in an ecosystem is an indicator of the stability of the ecosystem. The high diversity index of birds represents the healthy ecosystem and stable condition so that it can support bird life. The aim of the study was to determine the level of bird diversity on small islands in Maluku, namely Air Louw Hamlet Protected Forest in Ambon Island, bird species abundance and bird response to land cover changes. The study was conducted in April - June 2019 using the Line Transect method on a 100 m long track with a distance between 100 m lane, and the width of the transect band 50 m left and right lane on a plot area of 50,000 m2 (5 ha). Observations were carried out at 07.30 - 10.00 WIT and 16.00 - 18.30 WIT. The results of the study found that the number of birds on transect 1 was 81, transects 5 were 46, transects 2 were 37, transects 4 were 32, and transects 3 were 18. The Margalef Richness Index value (R1) ranges from low to moderate at 2.596851 - 2.873082 (2.5 <R1> 4). This condition was caused by the low number of bird species found in the study location, which was only as many as 22 species. The Shannon-Winer Diversity Index (H‘) was classified as moderate at 1.05 - 1.88 (1 <H’> 3). Evenness Index (E) was classified as medium on 4 transects of 0.24 - 0.56. The density of bird populations on each transect was 1 transect (81 tails) with a population density of 147 tails / ha. Transects 2 was 37 tails with a population density of 72 tails /ha. Transects 3 was 18 tails with a population density of 41 /ha. Transect 4 was 32 tails with a population density of 61 tails / ha and transect 5 was 46 tails with a population density of 74 tails /ha. The highest population density was Maluku Perling Bird as many as 157 tails / 5 ha, Walet Sapi as many as 83 tails / 5 ha, Cabai Kelabu as many as 44 tails / 5 ha and Madu Sriganti Bird as many as 42 tails / 5 ha. The results also found 2 species of birds that have conservation values and protected values as well as endemic species of Maluku with very limited distribution properties, namely Sikatan Kelabu (Myagra galeata) and Cabai Kelabu (Dicaeum vulneratum). Keywords: Maluku endemic bird, bird diversity, protected forest, small islands References Alikodra, H. S. (2002). Pengelolaan Satwa Liar, Jilid 1 [Wildlife Management, Volume 1]. Bogor: Fakultas Kehutanan, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Brian, J., Coates, K., & Bishop, D. (1997). Aguide to the Birds of Wallcea. Queensland, Australia: Dove Publication. Fadrikal, R., Fadliah, E., & Nugroho, J. (2015). Komunitas burung urban: Pengaruh luas wilayah dan jenis pohon ruang terbuka hijau terhadap keanekaragaman burung [Urban bird community: Effect of area and tree species on green open space on bird diversity]. Jurnal biota, 1, 1842–1846. https://doi.org/10.13057/psnmbi/m010815 Hernowo, J. B., & Prasetyo, L. B. (1989). Konsep ruang terbuka hijau di kota sebagai pendukung pelestarian burung. Media Konservasi [The concept of green open space in the city as a support for bird conservation. Media Conservation, 2(4), 61-71. Kindersley, D. (2010). Ensiklopedia Dunia Hewan [Animal World Encyclopedia]. Penerbit Lantera Abadi. Jakarta. hlm. 224. Latumahina, F., Musyafa, M., Sumardi, S., & Putra, N. S. (2015). Respon semut terhadap kerusakan antropogenik dalam hutan Lindung Sirimau Ambon [Ant response to anthropogenic damage in the Sirimau Protected Forest in Ambon]. Jurnal Manusia dan Lingkungan, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.22146/jml.18739 Lavieren. (1982). Wildlife Management in the Tropic. School of Environmental Conservation Management. Bogor. Ludwiq, J. A., & Reynold, J. F. (1988). Statistical Ecology a Primer on Method and Computing. New York: John Wiley and Sons. Mackinnon, J., Phillipps, K., & Balen, B. V. (2000). The birds in Sumatra, Java, Bali and Borneo. Bogor: Center for Biology-LIPI. [Indonesian]. Odum, E. P. (1971). Dasar-Dasar Ekologi [Ecology Basics]. Yogyakarta: Edisi ketiga Gadjah Mada University Press. Perfecto, I., Vandermeer, J., Hanson, P., & Cartin, V. (1997). Arthropod biodiversity loss and the transformation of a tropical agro-ecosystem. Biodiversity & Conservation, 6(7), 935–945. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018359429106 Philpott, S. M., Soong, O., Lowenstein, J. H., Pulido, A. L., Lopez, D. T., Flynn, D. F. B., & DeCleck, F. (2009). Functional richness and ecosystemservices: bird predation on arthropods in tropical agroecosystems. Ecological Applications, 19, 1858–1867. https://doi.org/10.1890/08-1928.1 Sahusilawane, 2017. Keanekaragaman Jenis Burung di Kawasan Hutan Lindung Gunung Sirimau. Jurnal Hutan Pulau-Pulau Kecil [Bird Diversity in the Gunung Sirimau Protected Forest Area. Journal of Small Island Forests], 1(3), 247-261. https://doi.org/10.30598/jhppk.2017.1.3.247 Sekercioglu, C. H. (2012). Bird functional diversity and ecosystem servicesin tropical forests, agroforests and agricultural areas. Journal of Ornithology, 153, 153–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10336-012-0869-4 Sozer, R., Nijman, V., & Shannaz, J. (2000). Teknik-Teknik Ekspedisi Lapangan [Field Expedition Techniques], Survei Burung. BirdLife Int – IP. Bogor 16003. Indonesia. Original Edition by: C. Bibby, M. Jones, & S. Marsden (1998). Expedition Field Techniques. Expedition Advisory Centre; Royal Geographical Society (with the Institute of British Geographical) 1 Kensington Gore, London SW7 2 AR. Sujatnika, J. P., Soehartono, T. R., Crosby, M. J., & Mardiatuti, A. (1995). Melestarikan Keanekaragaman Hayati Indonesia. Pendekatan Daerah Burung Endemik [Preserving Indonesian Biodiversity. Approach to the Endemic Bird Region]. Jakarta: PHPA/BirdLife Internasional – Indonesia Programme. Susanto, E., Mulyani, Y. A., & Suryobroto, B. (2016). Bird communities In Seblat Nature Recreation Park (SNRP) North Bengkulu, Bengkulu. Biosaintifika, 8(1), 25-32. https://doi.org/10.15294/biosaintifika.v8i1.4948 Temple, S. A., & Wiens, J. A. (1989). Bird populations and environmental change: can birds be bioindicators? American Birds, 43, 260–270. Tews, J., Brose, U., Grimm, V., Tielborger, K., Wichmann, M. C., Schwager, M., & Jeltsch, F. (2004). Animal species diversitydriven by habitat heterogeneity/diversity: the importance of keystone structures. J Biogeogr, 31, 79−92. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.0305-0270.2003.00994.x Tortosa, F. S. (2000). Habitat Selection by Flocking Wintering Common Cranes (Grus grus) at Los Pedroches Valley, Spain. Etologia, 8, 21-24. Welty, J. C., & Baptista, L. (1988). The Life of Bird (4th ed.). New York: Saunders. Wenny, D. G., et al. (2011). The Need to Quantify Ecosystem Services Provided By Birds. The Auk, 128(1), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1525/auk.2011.10248 Wiens, J. A. (1992). The Ecology of Bird Communities. London: Cambridge University Press. |
View Abstract References Full text PDF |
3 |
Exploring Human-Nature Relationships amongst Young People: Findings of a Quantitative Survey between Germany and South AfricaAnsgar Johannes Gräntzdörffer, Angela James, & Doris Elster
pp. 417-424 | Article Number: ijese.2019.034
Abstract The environmental crisis needs to be challenged by fundamental socio-ecological transformation. Contemporary science education programs focus on influential factors like nature experience, emotional bonds with the natural environment and understanding of nature trying to promote pro-environmental behaviors amongst young people. In order to compare two contrasting countries this quantitative survey was carried out with the participation of 836 young people in Germany, and 846 in South Africa aged 12 to 19 (M = 14.68, SD = .52). We found that young South Africans spent more time in nature together with their schools and are more emotionally related to their natural world. In conclusion, the human-nature relationships amongst young people in both countries can be described as inconsistent, detached and disturbed. Keywords: connectedness to nature, environmental identity, human-nature relationships, nature experience, pro-environmental behaviors, quantitative survey, understanding of nature References Adams, S., Savahl S., & Casas, F. (2015). The relationship between children’s perceptions of natural environment and their subjective well-being. Department of Psychology, Western Cape South Africa. Alyassa, L., & Nelson, K.E. (2017). Increasing Children’s Positive Connection To, Orientation Toward, and Knowledge of Nature through Camp Experiences. In International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 12(5), 933-944. Bixler, R. D., Floyd, M. F., & Hammitt, W. E. (2002). Environmental socialization: quantitative tests of the childhood play hypothesis. Environ. Behav., 34, 795–818. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391602237248 Bragg, R., Wood, C., Barton, J., & Pretty, J. (2013). Measuring connection to nature in children aged 8–12 – A robust methodology for the RSPB. University of Essex. Brämer, R., Koll, H., & Schild, H. J. (2016). 7. Jugendreport Natur 2016: Natur Nebensache? [7th Youth Report Nature 2016: Nature a Minor Matter?]. Retrieved from http://www.wanderforschungs.de/files/jugendrepoert2016-web-final-160914 Bundesministerium für Umwelt, Naturschutz und nukleare Sicherheit (2017). Naturbewusstsein 2017 – Bevölkerungsumfrage zu Natur und biologischer Vielfalt. Retrieved from https://www.bmu.de/fileadmin/Daten_BMU/Pools/Broschueren/naturbewusstseinsstudie_2017_de_bf.pdf Busse, M., & Menzel, S. (2013). Voraussetzungen für ein Engagement junger Menschen für Nachhaltige Entwicklung. In Korn, H. & Feit, U. (Eds.), Treffpunkt Biologische Vielfalt XII-Interdisziplinärer Forschungsaustausch im Rahmen des Übereinkommens über die biologische Vielfalt (115-121). Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Capaldi, C. A., Dopko, R. L., & Zelenski, J. M. (2014). The relationship between nature connectedness and happiness: a meta-analysis. Front. Psychol., 5, 976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00976 Clayton, S. (2003). Environmental identity: A conceptual and operational definition. In Clayton, S. & Opotow, S. (Eds.), Identity and the natural environment. The psychological significance of nature (45–65). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/3644.001.0001 Clayton, S. (2012). Environment and identity. In Clayton, S. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conversation Psychology (164–180). New York: Oxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199733026.001.0001 DeHaan, G. (2008). Nachhaltigkeit und Gerechtigkeit. Grundlagen und schulpraktische Konsequenzen. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. Department of Basic Education, Republic of South Africa (2005). Education For All – 2005 Country Status Report: South Africa. Pretoria, South Africa. Die Senatorin für Kinder und Bildung (2019). Bildung für eine nachhaltige Entwicklung. Retrieved from https://www.bildung.bremen.de/bne-5249 Dornhoff, M., Hörnschemeyer, A., Fiebelkorn, F., & Menzel, S. (2018). Welche Vorstellungen haben Jugendliche von nachhaltiger Ernährung? In Korn, H. & Bockmühl, K. (Eds.), Treffpunkt Biologische Vielfalt XVI – Interdisziplinärer Forschungsaustausch im Rahmen des Übereinkommens über die biologische Vielfalt (101–107). Bonn: Bundesamt für Naturschutz. Dornhoff, M., Sothmann, J. N., Fiebekorn, F., & Menzel, S. (2019). Nature Relatedness and Environmental Concern of Young People in Ecuador and Germany. Front. Psychol., 10, 453. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00453 Forest, F., Greneyer, R., Rouget, M., Davies, T. J., Cowling, M. R., Faith, D. P., Balmford, A., Manning, J., Proches., van der Bank, M., Reeves, G., Hedderson. T. A. J., & Savolainen, V. (2007). Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. London: Nature Publishing Group. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05587 Gaiser, W., Krug, W., & Rijke, J. (2012). Jugend, Nachhaltigkeit und nachhaltiger Konsum. Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung. Gräntzdörffer, A. (2016). Investigation of Learners’ Experience with Nature: A South African and German Perspective (Dissertation). Universität Bremen. Grunenberg, H., Küster, K., & Rode, H. (2012). Greenpeace, Nachhaltigkeitsbarometer – Was bewegt die Jugend? Hamburg: VAS Verlag. Hefler, E., Cervinka, R., & Zeidler, D. (2009). Connectedness with Nature and Support in Life through Spirituality. Zürich: Environmental Psychology. Hinds, J., & Sparks, P. (2009). Investigating environmental identity, well-being and meaning. Ecopsychology, 1(4), 181–186. https://doi.org/10.1089/eco.2009.0026 Ipbes (2019). Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Retrieved from https://www.dropbox.com/sh/yd8l2v0u4jqptp3/AAACtf6ctsoUQ9hlPQxLpVsKa?dl=0&preview=20190504+IPBES7+Media+Release+Global+Assessment+Final+Errata2+ENG.pdf Kals, E., Schumacher, D., & Montada, L. (1998). Naturerfahrungen, Verbundenheit mit der Natur und ökologische Verantwortung als Determinanten naturschützenden Verhaltens. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 29, 5–19. Karlegger, A. (2010). Naturverbundenheit und Umweltidentität im Jugendalter. Der Einfluss von Naturkontakt und sozialem Kontext. Diplomarbeit, Universität Wien. Kattmann, U. (1994). Wozu Biologiedidaktik? Möglichkeiten einer praktischen Wissenschaft. In Kattmann, U. (Eds.), Biologiedidaktik in der Praxis. Oldenburg/Köln: Zentrum für pädagogische Berufspraxis der Universität/Aulis. Kellert, S. R., & Wilson, E. O. (Eds.). (1993). The Biophilia Hypothesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. Kollender, L., & Zabel, J. (2013). Nature Experience and Perception of Nature in Peruvian school students. Closer to Nature, but still far away? Presented at the European Science Education Research Association (ESERA) 2013, September 2nd–September 7th in Nicosia, Cyprus. Lindau, A. K., Lindner, M., Claus, S., Schnorr, C., & Vetter, S. (2018). The Bittersweet Journey of Chocolate - eine virtuelle Exkursion als Beitrag zum Globalen Lernen 2.0 in der universitäten Lehrerinnen- und Lehrerbildung. In N. Brendel, G. Schrüfer, & I. Schwarz (Eds.): Globales Lernen im digitalen Zeitalter, (171-189). Waxmann: Münster. Ljunggren, J. (2011). Environmental related projects at Nxuba Senior Primary School in South Africa. Retrieved from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:438166/FULLTEXT01.pdf Lockie, S., Sonnenfeld, D., & Fisher, D. (Eds.). (2014). Routledge International Handbook of Social and Environmental Change. London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203814550 Lude, A. (2014). Von der Umweltbildung zur Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. In Lude, A. & Scholderer, K. (Eds.), Nachhaltigkeit lernen rund ums Jahr – 20 Aktionstipps für die ganze Familie (7–13). PH Ludwigsburg und NABU Baden-Württemberg. Mayer, S. F., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.10.001 Menzel, S., & Bögeholz, S. (2008). Warum führt Wissen nicht zum Handeln? Schulen müssen mehr als reines Fachwissen vermitteln. Hotspot, 9(17), 15–16. Mittelsten Scheid, N., & Hößle, C. (2007). Bewerten im Biologieunterricht: Niveaus von Bewertungskompetenz. Retrieved from https://www.bcp.fu-berlin.de/biologie/arbeitsgruppen/didaktik/Erkenntnisweg/2007/2007_06_Mittelsten.pdf Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, GA. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403, 853–858. https://doi.org/10.1038/35002501 Natursoziologie (2016). 7. Jugendreport Natur 2016- Erste Ergebnisse. Retrieved from https://www.natursoziologie.de/files/jugendreport2016-web-final-160914-v3_1903161842.pdf Nisbet, E. K., & Zelenski, J. M. (2013). The NR-6: a new brief measure of nature relatedness. Front. Psychol. 4, 813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00813 Otto, S., & Pensini, P. (2017). Nature-based education of children: environmental knowledge and connectedness to nature, together, are related to ecological behavior. Glob. Environ. Chang., 47, 88–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.09.009 Pohl, D. T. (2006). Naturerfahrungen und Naturzugänge von Kindern. Dissertation, PH Ludwigsburg. Pütz, N., & Wittkowske, S. (2012). Schulgarten- und Freilandarbeit Lernen, studieren und forschen. Klinkhardt: Bad Heilbrunn. Raudsepp, M. (2005). Emotional connection to nature. Its socio-psychological correlates and associations with pro-environmental attitudes and behavior. In B. Martens & A. G. Keul (Eds.), Designing social innovation (83–91). Göttingen: Hogrefe. Riekmann, M. (2010). Die globale Perspektive der Bildung für nachhaltige Entwicklung. Eine europäisch-lateinamerikanische Studie zu Schlüsselkompetenzen für Denken und Handeln in der Weltgesellschaft. Berlin: Berliner Wissenschafts-Verlag. Roberts, C. M., Bohnsack, J. A., Gell, F., Hawkins, J. P., & Goodridge, R. (2001). Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. Science, 292, 1920–1923. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.294.5548.1920 Schellnhuber, J., Rahmstorf, S., & Winkelmann, R. (2016). Why the right climate target was agreed in Paris. Retrieved from http://www.pik-potsdam.de/~ricardaw/publications/schellnhuber_rahmstorf16.pdf https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate3013 Schmitt, M. T., Aknin, L., Axsen, J., & Shwom, R. L. (2018). Unpacking the Relationships between Pro-environmental Behavior, Life Satisfaction, and Perceived Ecological Threat. Ecological Economics, 143(C), 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007 Schultz, P. W. (2001). Assessing the structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. J. Environ. Psychol., 21, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2001.0227 Ständige Konferenz der Kultusminister der Länder in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland (2004). Standards für die Lehrerbildung: Bildungswissenschaften. Berlin. Statistics South Africa (2016). Provincial profile: Kwazulu-Natal – Community Survey 2016. Retrieved from http://cs2016.statssa.gov.za/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/KZN.pdf Statistisches Landesamt Freie Hansestadt Bremen (2018). Bremen in Zahlen 2018. Retrieved from https://www.statistik.bremen.de/publikationen/bremen_in_zahlen-2056 Thondhlana, G., & Hlatshwayo, T. (2018). Pro-Environmental Behaviour in Student Residences at Rhodes University, South Africa. Rhodes University, South Africa. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10082746 United Nations (2017). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2017. Retrieved from https://sdgactioncampaign.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/TheSustainableDevelopmentGoalsReport2017.pdf Van Riper, C. J., Browning, M. H. E. M., & Becker, D. (2019). Correction to: Human–Nature Relationships and Normative Beliefs Influence Behaviors that Reduce the Spread of Aquatic Invasive Species. In Environmental Management (63) 6 (835). Basel: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-019-01149-8 Verbrugge, L. N. H., Van den Born, R. J. G., & Lenders, H. J. R. (2013). Exploring Public Perception of Non-native Species from a Visions of Nature Perspective. Environmental Management, 6(52), 1562-1573. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-013-0170-1 Von Braun, J. (2017). Children as agents of change for sustainable development. In A. M. Battro, P. Lena, M. S. Sorondo & J. von Braun (Eds.) Children and Sustainbale Development, (pp. 17-30). Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47130-3_2 Wilson, E. O. (1984). Biophilia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Young, J. (2012). What the robin knows: How birds reveal the secrets of the natural world. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Company. Zeidler, D. H. (2009). Intrapersonale Ressourcen in der Gesundheitsförderung: Die Bedeutung von Selbstwirksamkeitserwartung, Natur und Spiritualität für die Rehabilitation bei Alkoholabhängigkeit. Diplomarbeit, Universität Wien. Zylstra, M. (2014). Exploring meaningful nature experience connectedness with nature and the revitalization of transformative education for sustainability (Dissertation), University of Stellenbosch. |
View Abstract References Full text PDF |
4 |
The Effect of Cooperative Learning Models and Formative Test Forms toward PPKn (Civics Education) Learning Outcomes by Controlling Prior KnowledgeHamuni, Muhammad Idrus, Wa Ode Reni, & Karsadi
pp. 425-433 | Article Number: ijese.2019.035
Abstract This study aims at investigating the effect of cooperative learning model and formative test form toward PPKn learning outcome controlling by prior knowledge. It used factorial design 2 x 2. Sample of this study consists of 80 students who are selected through cluster random sampling. The data was obtained through test instrument. The data was analyzed by using covariance (ANACOVA). The result of this study shows that, after controlling prior knowledge: 1) student’s civics education learning outcome who are taught under cooperative learning model with STAD type is higher than students who are taught under cooperative learning model with NHT type, 2) student’s civics education learning outcome who are given essay formative test is higher than students who are given multiple choice formative test, 3) there is an effect of interaction between cooperative learning model and formative test toward civics education learning outcome, 4) for students who are given essay formative test, student’s civics education learning outcome who are taught under cooperative learning model with STAD type is higher than students who are taught under cooperative learning model with NHT type, 5) for students who are given multiple choice formative test, student’s civics education learning outcome who are taught under cooperative learning model with STAD type is higher than students who are taught under cooperative learning model with NHT type, 6) for students who are taught under cooperative instruction model with STAD type, student’s civics education learning outcome who are given essay formative test is higher than students who are given multiple choice formative test, 7) for students who are taught under cooperative learning model with NHT type, student’s civics education learning outcome who are given essay formative test is higher than students who are given multiple choice formative test. Keywords: cooperative learning model, formative test, PPKn learning outcome, prior knowledge References Gronlund, N. E., & Linn, R. L. (1982). Constructing Achievement Test (pp.119-174). London: Prentice-Hall Inc. Hamuni, & Muhammad Idrus (2019). The Effect of Cooperative Instruction Model and Formative Test Form toward PKn (Civics Education) Learning Outcome Controlled by Prior Competence. International Journal of Multidiciplinary and Current Research (IJMCR), 7, 114-121. https://doi.org/10.14741/ijmcr/v.7.2.4 Hopkins, C. D., & Antes, R. L. (1979). Classroom Testing: Construction. Illinois: FE. Peacock Publisher, Inc. Lie, A. (2014). Cooperative Learning. Jakarta, PT: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia. Marrow, J. R, Jr, et al. (2005). Measurement and Evaluation in Human Performance (pp. 196-204). USA: Human Kinetics. Nitko, A. J. (2001). Educational Assessment of Student. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Oosterhorf, A. (1996). Developing and Using Classroom Assessments (pp. 86-89). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Popham, J. W. (1981). Educational Measurement. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Pusung, S. (2016) Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran dan Penilaian Tugas Terhadap Hasil Belajar Sains Dengan Mengontrol Pengetahuan Awal (Dissertation PPs), Universitas Negeri Jakarta. (Tidak Dipublikasi), pp. 209-217. Rokot, A. (2016). The Influence of Cooperative Learning Model And Formative Test Toward The Chemistry Learning Achievement By Controlling The Initial Competency. International Journal of Health Medicine and Current Research, 1(02), 217-225. Rusman, (2014). Model-Model Pembelajaran: Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. Sudijono, A. (2012). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada. Sumantri, M. S., & Satriani, R. (2016). The Effect of Formatif Testing and Self-Directed Learning on Mathematics Learning Outcomes. IEJEE, 8(3), 507-524. Wieresma, W., & Jurs, S. G. (1990). Educational Measurement and Testing. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. |
View Abstract References Full text PDF |
5 |
Investigating Student’s Geometric Thinking in Looking for the Linkages of Quadrilaterals (A Case Study on Students in The Formal Operation Stage)Agustan Syamsuddin
pp. 435-444 | Article Number: ijese.2019.036
Abstract The purpose of this paper is to investigate the ability of students in understanding the relationship of quadrilateral based on their geometric thinking skill. It can help the students in solving problem to get a correct solution. The participants of this paper involved two students eighth-grade from 2 secondary schools in the area of Kabupaten Bone, Makassar, Indonesia. The participants were chosen, based on Piaget’s cognitive development, respectively one student at the early formal and late formal operation stage. To investigate students’s geometric thinking in constructing their understanding about the linkage of quadrillaterals, the researcher conducted task-based interviews by drawing activities, identifying and stringing the relationship between quadrilaterals. The results of this research showed that the student at the early formal stage (PEFO) stringing 14 of 15 relationships and tends to use 3 attributes (position, size, shape of quadrilateral). Addition the student at the late formal stage (PLFO) stringing 7 of 15 relationships and tends to use 4 attributes (position, size, shape of quadrilateral and rotational symmetry). There are all participants’ tendencies in drawing a quadrilateral always start drawing rectangel or square. It indicates that students are very familiar both of them. Therefore, it suggests that, in teaching, a teacher does not only start from a square or rectangle but also a teacher can start another quadrilateral such as parallelogram, rhombus, kite and trapezoid. Keywords: geometric thinking, formal operation, quadrilateral References Abdullah, A. H., & Zakaria, E. (2011). Students’ Perceptions Towards the van Hiele’s Phases of Learning Geometry Using Geometer’s Sketchpad Software. Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 5(7), 787-792 Abdusakkir. (2002). Pembelajaran Geometri Berdasar Teori van Hiele Berbantuan Komputer. Jurnal Matematika atau Pembelajarannya, 8(special edition), 344-348. Adey, P. (1995) Cognitive acceleration: Science and other entrances to formal operations. London: King’s College London. Burger, W. F., & Shaughnessy, J. M. (1986). Characterizing the Van Hiele Levels of Development in Geometry. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 17(1), 31-48. https://doi.org/10.2307/749317 Hergenhahn, B. R., & Olson, M. H. (2008). Theories of Learning. Jakarta: Kencana. Husnaeni. (2006). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran van Hiele dalam Membantu Siswa Kelas IV SD Membangun Konsep Segitiga. Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(2), 67-68. Idris, N. (2011). The Impact of Using Geometers’ Sketchpad on Malaysia Students’ Achievement and van Hiele Thinking. Journal for Mathematics Education, 2(2), 94-107. Leongson, J. A., & Limjap, A. A. (2003). Assessing the Mathematics Achievement of College Freshmen using Piaget’s Logical Operations. Waikiki: Hawaii International Conference on Education. Monks, F. J. A. K. (2006). Psikologi Perkembangan: Pengantar dalam Berbagai Bagiannya. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press. Solso, O. H. (2008). Psikologi Kognitif. Jakarta: Erlangga. Sugiyono. (2005). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sunardi. (2005). Pengembangan model Pembelajaran Geometri Berbasis Teori van Hiele (Dissertation of Mathematics Education Study Program), Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Suyanto. (2005). Penelusuran Tahap Berpikir Geometris van Hiele Siswa Kelas III SMP Negeri 21 Surabaya yang Mengikuti Bimbingan Belajar Primagama pada Pokok Bahasan Segiempat (Thesis Mathematics Education Study Program), Universitas Negeri Surabaya. Tambunan, S. M. (2006). Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Spasial dengan Prestasi Belajar Matematika. Makara, Sosial Humaniora, 10(1), 27-32. https://doi.org/10.7454/mssh.v10i1.13 Van de Walle, J. A. (2001). Geometric Thinking and Geometric Concept. In Elementary and Middle School Mathematics. Teaching developmentally 4th ed. Boston: Pearson Education. Yazdani, M. A. (2008). The Gagne-van Hiele Connection: A Comparative Analysis of Two Theoretical Learning Frameworks. Journal of Mathematics Science & Mathematics Education, 3(1), 58-63. Yeni, E. M. (2011). Pemanfaatan Benda-Benda Manipulative Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Geometri Dan Kemampuan Titik Ruang Siswa Kelas V Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1(special edition), 63-75. |
View Abstract References Full text PDF |